Washington : As the conflict in the Middle East intensifies, former U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked fresh controversy by suggesting that the United States could seize Iran’s oil resources — including its most critical export hub, Kharg Island.
Speaking amid the ongoing war, Trump remarked that his “favourite thing” would be to “take the oil in Iran,” signaling a dramatic escalation in rhetoric and potentially in strategy. He also hinted that capturing Kharg Island — a small but highly strategic island in the Persian Gulf — could be done with relative ease.
A Strategic Target at the Heart of Iran’s Economy
Kharg Island plays a pivotal role in Iran’s economy. Located just off the country’s southern coast, the island handles roughly 90% of Iran’s oil exports, making it one of the most valuable energy assets in the region.
Control over the island would give any power enormous leverage over Iran’s economy and global oil supply chains. Analysts say that such a move could severely disrupt Tehran’s revenue streams and potentially shift the balance of the ongoing conflict.
The island has already been a focal point in the war. Earlier in March, U.S. forces carried out airstrikes targeting military infrastructure on Kharg Island, though energy facilities were deliberately spared.
Rising Military and Economic Risks
Despite Trump’s confident tone, military experts warn that seizing Kharg Island would be far from straightforward. Any ground operation would expose U.S. troops to missile attacks, drones, and naval threats in a highly volatile region.
There are also broader risks. Such an operation could trigger further escalation with Iran and potentially draw in regional actors, including groups aligned with Tehran. It may also disrupt vital shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes.
Global markets are already reacting. Oil prices have surged above $100 per barrel as fears grow over supply disruptions, while stock markets in Asia and beyond have shown signs of strain.
Mixed Signals Amid War and Diplomacy
Interestingly, Trump’s remarks come at a time when diplomatic efforts are also underway. Reports indicate that indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran may be facilitated by countries such as Pakistan, even as military preparations continue.
This dual-track approach — combining aggressive rhetoric with ongoing negotiations — has created uncertainty about Washington’s true intentions.
A Flashpoint With Global Implications
Trump’s suggestion of “taking the oil” has drawn sharp attention globally, not only for its strategic implications but also for the precedent it could set under international law.
If pursued, the seizure of Kharg Island would mark a significant escalation in the conflict — one that could reshape geopolitics in the Middle East and send shockwaves through global energy markets.
For now, the situation remains fluid, with the world watching closely as tensions between Washington and Tehran continue to rise.
